GitLab Business Rule Checks
Mo checks GitLab merge requests against approved business rules before merge. Teams use it to catch pricing drift, permission changes, onboarding flow issues, and other risky logic changes before they ship.
Works with Slack and GitLab. No separate review workflow required.
#pricing-rules
@Mo approve this
"Trial period must stay at 7 days for new users."
mo-bot
bot
GitLab can tell you if the pipeline passed.
Mo tells you if the merge request still follows an approved business rule.
That difference matters when the code is technically valid but the product behavior is wrong.
Slack
Approve the rule where the conversation happens
GitLab MR
Developer opens the MR normally
Mo check
Mo reads the MR and compares it against approved rules
If the rule is broken, the MR is flagged
Merge-request review is good at catching implementation issues.
It is much worse at catching logic that quietly drifted away from what product, ops, or leadership approved.
Mo adds a merge-time check for exactly that.
Where review speed matters and small logic changes can have big downstream effects.
Where more code is generated and less product logic is held in one reviewer's head.
Where merge requests can affect sensitive flows, restricted access, or customer-visible rules.
Teams do not need to move rule definition into another system just to protect a few important behaviors. Slack stays the easiest place to approve rules. GitLab stays the place where merge decisions are enforced.
When needed, rules can also be added from uploaded documents.
No. Mo adds a rule-based check for whether a merge request still follows approved business logic.
Yes. Slack is the primary way teams approve rules and decisions.
No. Teams use it for pricing, permissions, onboarding, and other business-critical logic.
Yes. Mo also supports GitHub pull requests.
Used internally at Advante across 12+ projects including:




Approve rules in Slack. Let Mo flag merge requests that break them.